El formato OOXML "estándar" (?) de Microsoft
Leyendo este post de Rob Weir me indigno muchísimo (otra vez), con esta empresa que lo único que hace es mentir. Me pueden decir en qué supuesto estándar de documentación (XML en este caso) pueden figurar estos tags? : autoSpaceLikeWord95 (Emulate Word 95 Full-Width Character Spacing) footnoteLayoutLikeWW8 (Emulate Word 6.x/95/97 Footnote Placement) mwSmallCaps (Emulate Word 5.x for the Macintosh Small Caps Formatting) suppressTopSpacingWP (Emulate WordPerfect 5.x Line Spacing) lineWrapLikeWord6 (Emulate Word 6.0 Line Wrapping for East Asian Text) mwSmallCaps (Emulate Word 5.x for Macintosh Small Caps Formatting) shapeLayoutLikeWW8 (Emulate Word 97 Text Wrapping Around Floating Objects) truncateFontHeightsLikeWP6 (Emulate WordPerfect 6.x Font Height Calculation) useWord2002TableStyleRules (Emulate Word 2002 Table Style Rules) useWord97LineBreakRules (Emulate Word 97 East Asian Line Breaking) wpJustification (Emulate WordPerfect 6.x Paragraph Justification) shapeLayoutLikeWW8 (Emulate Word 97 Text Wrapping Around Floating Objects) Como dice Rob Weir al final del post: “So not only must an interoperable OOXML implementation first acquire and reverse-engineer a 14-year old version of Microsoft Word, you must also do the same thing with a 16-year old version of WordPerfect. Good luck.” ...